Publication Abstract

The effects of macroalgal cover on the spatial distribution of macrobenthic invertebrates: the effect of macroalgal morphology

The effects of macroalgal cover on the spatial distribution of macrobenthic invertebrates: the effect of macroalgal morphology

S.G. Bolam and T.F. Fernandes

The growth of green macroalgae in response to nutrient inputs is a common phenomenon in marine estuaries and sheltered bays. While the ecological effects of the growth of the most commonly occurring macroalgal taxa (Enteromorpha, Chaetomorpha, Ulva, Cladophora) have been well studied, the effects of a morphologically very different species, Vaucheria subsimplex, have not been investigated. This study investigated the ecological effects of the establishment of V. subsimplex on a relatively exposed intertidal sandflat, Drum Sands, Firth of Forth, Scotland. Because of the spatially heterogeneous development of the weed, the short term (4 weeks) and long term (20 weeks) effects of the weed could be studied using a survey approach in which the weed-affected and weed-free plots were interspersed. After 4 weeks, V. subsimplex significantly increased the mean number of individuals and diversity of the macrofauna, 8 of the 10 most abundant species showed significant increases in abundance compared to weed-free areas. After 20 weeks, mean number of species and individuals were significantly higher under weed patches while species diversity was reduced due to the numerical dominance of Pygospio elegans (Claparède). The weed therefore had an enriching effect on the macrofaunal communities on Drum Sands. The increased numbers of P. elegans, the numerical dominant infaunal species on Drum Sands, resulted mainly from enhanced larval recruitment to weed-affected areas. The effects of V. subsimplex on sediment characteristics were similar to those reported for other macroalgal taxa, i.e., increased water, organic and silt/clay contents, medium particle size and sorting coefficients, and reduced redox potentials.

The results from this study are compared to those for other, morphologically different macroalgal species, with particular reference to an Enteromorpha-implanted experiment on the same sandflat. Since the general effect of such macroalgal taxa on macrofaunal communities is a detrimental one, the present study supports the contention that macroalgal morphology is an important feature in algal-faunal interactions.

Reference:

S.G. Bolam and T.F. Fernandes. 2003.The effects of macroalgal cover on the spatial distribution of macrobenthic invertebrates: the effect of macroalgal morphology. Hydrobiologica, 475(1): 437-448

S.G. Bolam* and T.F. Fernandes

Hydrobiologica, 475(1): 437-448